2016年職稱英語《衛(wèi)生類》閱讀理解階段復(fù)習(xí)(8)

　　Given that a good year in the haute couture(高級定制女裝)business is one where you lose even more money than usual, the prevailing mood in Paris last week was sensational. The big-name designers were falling over themselves to boast of how many outfits they had sold at below cost price, and how this proved that the fashion business was healthier than ever. Jean—Paul Gaultier reported record sales. “But we don’t make any money out of it”, the designer assured journalists backstage. “No matter how successful you are, you can’t make a profit from couture,” explained Jean—Jacques Picart, a veteran fashion PR man, and co—founder of the now—bankrupt Lacroix house.

　　Almost 20 years have passed since the unusual economics of the couture business were first exposed. Outraged that he was Losing money on evening dresses costing tens of thousands of pounds, the couturier Jean-Louis Scherrer published of his costs. One outfit he described curtained over half a mile of gold thread 1 8, 000sequins(亮片), and had required hundreds of hours of hand—stitching in an atelier(制作室). A fair price would have been~50, 000, but the couturier could only get~35, 000 for it. Rather than riding high on the foolishness of the super—rich, he and his team could barely feed their hungry families.

　　The result was an outcry and the first of a series of government-and industry—sponsored inquiries into the surreal(超現(xiàn)實的)world of ultimate fashion. The trade continues to insist that couture offers you more than you pay for, but it’s not as simple as that. When such a temple of old wealth starts talking about value for money, it isn’t to convince anyone that dresses costing as much as houses are a bargain. Rather, it is to preserve the peculiar mystique(神秘), lucrative(利潤豐厚的)associations and threatened interests that couture represents.

　　Essentially, the arguments couldn’t be simpler. On one side are those who say that the business will die if it doesn’t change. On the other are those who say it will die if it is highly dated. Huge in its costs, tiny in its clientele and questionable in its influence, it still remains one of the great themes of Parisian life. In his book, The Fashion Conspiracy, Nicholas Coleridge estimates that the entire couture industry rests on the whims(一時興起)of less than 30 immensely wealthy women, and although the number may have grown in recent years with the new prosperity of Asia, the number of couture customers worldwide is no more than 4.000.

　　To qualify as couture, a garment must be entirely handmade by one of the 11 Paris couture houses registered to the Chambre Syndicale de la Haute Couture. Each house must employ at least 20 people. and show a minimum of 75 new designs a year. So far, so traditional. But the Big Four operators——Chanel, Dior, Givenchy and Gaultier—increasingly use couture as a marketing device for their far more profitable ready—to—wear, fragrance and accessory lines.

　　41. What is the main idea of the first paragraph?

　　A. The haute couture business is expanding quickly.

　　B. The haute couture designers make much profit in their sales.

　　C. The haute couture designers claim losses in their sales.

　　D. The haute couture businessmen are happy with their profit.

　　42. According to the second paragraph, Jean-Louis Scherrer_____.

　　A was very angry as he was losing money.

　　B. was in a worse financial position than other couturiers.

　　C. was one of the best-know couturiers.

　　D. stopped producing haute couture dresses.

　　43. The writer says that the outfit Jean-Louis Scherrer described_____.

　　A. was worth the price that was paid for it.

　　B. cost more to make than it should have.

　　C. was never sold to anyone.

　　D. should have cost the customer than it did.

　　44. The writer says in Paragraph 4 that there is disagreement over_____.

　　A. the future of haute couture.

　　B. the history of haute couture.

　　C. the real costs of haute couture.

　　D. the changes that need to be made in haute couture.

　　45. What is the writer’s tone toward haute couture business?

　　A. Somewhat ironical

　　B. Quite supportive.

　　C. Fairly friendly.

　　D. Rather indifferent.

　　答案：

　　41 C 第一段講到，許多著名設(shè)計師都在大肆宣揚他們以低于成本價的價格賣了多少件衣服，后面又引用了幾位設(shè)計師的話，說他們不會從服裝設(shè)計上賺任何錢，因此第一段的主題是高級定制女裝設(shè)計師們宣稱自己在虧損。

　　42 A 第二段第二句的開頭是：Outraged that he was losing money on evening dresses costing tens of thousands of pounds,……說明Jean-Louis對自己的虧損很生氣。其他三項中所提到的事文中并未提及。

　　43 D 第二段倒數(shù)第二句：A fair price would have been￡50,000,but the couturier could only get￡35, 000 for it.說明服裝的價格應(yīng)該更高，可實際賣不到那么多錢。

　　44 A 第四段第二句、第三句：On one side are those who say that the business will die if it doesn't change. On the other are those who say it will die if it does.人們是在為定制女裝的未來爭論。

　　45 A 此題通過文章的標(biāo)題和正文的討論便可判斷作者的態(tài)度有些諷刺的意味。

   編輯推薦：

　　2016職稱英語考試《綜合類》考點詞匯匯總

　　2016職稱英語《衛(wèi)生類》語法考點匯總

　　【備考經(jīng)驗】2016年職稱英語詞匯記憶技巧匯總
　　2016年職稱英語考試?yán)砉ゎ愝o導(dǎo)資料匯總
　　環(huán)球網(wǎng)校友情提示：如果您在此過程中遇到任何疑問，請登錄環(huán)球網(wǎng)校職稱英語頻道及論壇，我們隨時與廣大考生朋友們一起交流!